As the 2024 U.S. presidential race intensifies, polling indicates that Democratic candidate Kamala Harris and Republican candidate Donald Trump are nearly neck-and-neck in key battleground states. Current surveys show that in seven critical swing states, the candidates’ support levels fluctuate by no more than 2 percentage points.
**How is the U.S. President Elected?**
Unlike most elections where the candidate with the most popular votes wins, the U.S. presidential election is determined by the Electoral College, consisting of 538 electoral votes across 50 states. California holds the most electoral votes at 54, while smaller states have a minimum of 3. A candidate must secure at least 270 electoral votes to win.
Except for Maine and Nebraska, all states use a winner-takes-all system, where the candidate with the most popular votes in a state receives all of its electoral votes. Major news outlets and political analysis websites have identified Arizona, Nevada, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, and Georgia as the seven key battleground states for the 2024 election.
In a recent analysis by the Washington Post, the current political landscape of these swing states was examined, highlighting crucial factors for both Trump and Harris.
**Pennsylvania (19 Electoral Votes)**
As the battleground state with the highest electoral votes, Pennsylvania has been pivotal in both of the last two elections. In 2016, Trump became the first Republican presidential candidate to win the state since 1988. However, Biden regained it for the Democrats in 2020, winning more votes in key areas like Philadelphia and Pittsburgh.
The Washington Post emphasized that winning Pennsylvania could be crucial for the overall election, suggesting that the victor only needs to secure two additional swing states to reach the 270 electoral vote threshold.
Key observation points are the Philadelphia metro area, Pittsburgh, and the region between Pittsburgh and Harrisburg. The analysis indicates a slight decline in Democratic voter support in the Philadelphia area, falling from 85% in 2012 to 81% in 2020. Harris must reverse this trend. Meanwhile, Trump’s growing appeal among less-educated voters demonstrates the necessity for him to strengthen support in rural areas to gain an advantage.
**Georgia (16 Electoral Votes)**
Traditionally a Republican stronghold in 2012 and 2016, Georgia flipped in 2020, becoming a crucial victory for Biden with a narrow margin of just under 12,000 votes.
The rapidly changing demographic in suburban Atlanta has made Georgia more competitive for Democrats. The Washington Post points out that suburban areas will be key in determining outcomes, along with rural counties where Trump must mitigate Democratic gains.
Key points of interest include Atlanta, Clayton County, and Muscogee County, particularly because the latter two have significant African American populations. In contrast, Bartow and Carroll Counties are major agricultural regions. Harris needs to maintain and expand the Democratic advantage in Atlanta, as national polls show an uptick in Trump’s support among African American voters, which could substantially impact Georgia.
**North Carolina (16 Electoral Votes)**
Since 2008, the Democrats have not won North Carolina, but previous elections have shown a narrow margin of less than 4 percentage points. In the 2020 election, Trump won the state by just 1 percentage point. Current polling indicates that Trump’s lead here is smaller than in Arizona and Georgia, presenting a vulnerability for him. The Democratic strategy will hinge on gaining votes in urban areas, particularly Charlotte and Raleigh.
Key observation areas include the cities of Raleigh and Charlotte, as well as Buncombe, Swain, Robeson, Davidson, and Randolph counties. Although Buncombe and Swain have historically voted Democratic, recent hurricane damage could shift dynamics.
The Washington Post concluded that Harris’s success in North Carolina will depend on bolstering Democratic support in densely populated urban centers. Given the rapid growth of urban populations and educated voters, Trump may find it harder to rely on rural votes to win North Carolina.
**Michigan (15 Electoral Votes)**
Before Trump’s narrow victory in 2016, Michigan had been a stronghold for Democrats for three decades. The political landscape is currently changing, with visible divisions between pro-Trump rural residents and pro-Democrat urban voters beginning to blur.
Key focus areas include Detroit, Oakland County, Macomb County, Kent County, and the Upper Peninsula. The analysis suggests that Harris must maintain strong support in suburban areas while preventing the rural vote from swinging back overwhelmingly to Trump. For Trump, winning back support in Detroit and Macomb County, where his support dipped in 2020, is critical.
**Arizona (11 Electoral Votes)**
In 2012, Republicans secured Arizona by a 200,000-vote margin, but Biden flipped the state in 2020 with a margin of just 10,000 votes, marking the Democrats’ second win here since the 1940s. Given strong Democratic performance in the state in the 2022 midterms, Arizona remains a key battleground. Current polling shows Trump performing better here than in other swing states.
Key areas of interest include Maricopa, Pima, Yuma, and Mohave Counties. The analysis indicates that while Democrats have an edge in Pima County, securing Maricopa County is vital for Harris, as it was key to Biden’s victory in 2020. Conversely, Trump needs to regain lost rural support while performing well in metropolitan areas.
**Wisconsin (10 Electoral Votes)**
Wisconsin’s electoral landscape has shifted in recent years, with Trump winning by a narrow margin of 0.8% in 2016 and Biden reclaiming it by about 0.6% in 2020. Although Wisconsin has only 10 electoral votes, its significance in national elections is profound.
Characterized by predominantly white and rural voters, Wisconsin offers an interesting challenge for Democrats, who have historically performed well among this demographic. However, suburban voters lean more towards Republicans, benefiting Trump.
Key areas to watch include Dane County, Brown County, Winnebago County, Dodge County, and the Milwaukee area. The Post notes that for Harris to succeed, she must secure more votes in Milwaukee than Biden did previously, while Trump can afford to lose some ground in more educated communities like Dane County and still have a chance to win.
**Nevada (6 Electoral Votes)**
On the surface, Nevada appears to lean blue, having voted Democratic in the last four presidential elections with a significant margin in 2008. However, Trump narrowed the margin to just 2.4 percentage points in both 2016 and 2020. Recent polling indicates a highly competitive race.
Observation areas include Clark County, where Las Vegas is located and which accounts for nearly three-quarters of Nevada’s population, and Washoe County. Despite a strong historical advantage for Democrats in Clark County, their lead has decreased over the past elections.
The Washington Post’s analysis posits that if Harris can restore a double-digit lead in Clark County, her path to victory in Nevada is strong. Conversely, Trump’s focus should be on eroding the Democratic advantage in that county, as evidenced by his “tip tax relief” proposal aimed at benefiting the service industry, a move echoed by Harris.